首页> 外文OA文献 >The Flight from Arbitration: An Empirical Study of Ex Ante Arbitration Clauses in Publicly-Held Companies\u27 Contracts
【2h】

The Flight from Arbitration: An Empirical Study of Ex Ante Arbitration Clauses in Publicly-Held Companies\u27 Contracts

机译:仲裁之间的飞行:对公开持股公司的合同仲裁条款的实证研究\ u27合同

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We study a data set of 2,858 contracts contained as exhibits in Form 8-K filings by reporting corporations over a six month period in 2002 for twelve types of contracts and a seven month period in 2002 for merger contracts. Because 8-K filings are required only for material events, these contracts likely are carefully negotiated by sophisticated parties who are well-informed about the contract terms. These contracts, therefore, provide evidence of efficient ex ante solutions to contracting problems. The vast majority of contracts did not require arbitration. Only about 11 percent of the contracts included binding arbitration clauses. The rate of arbitration clauses varied substantially by type of contract. For example, pooling and servicing agreements and trust agreements had no arbitration clauses while employment and licensing contracts had the highest rate of arbitration clauses, 37 percent and 33 percent respectively. Arbitration clauses are strongly negatively associated with standardization of contract terms: the more standardized the contract, the less likely it will mandate arbitration of disputes. Contracts with California connections tended to have high rates of arbitration clauses while contracts with New York connections tended to have low rates of arbitration clauses. Arbitration clauses were significantly more likely to appear in contracts with international connections, but even in such contracts, the clauses were infrequent in absolute terms. Only 20 percent of international contracts contained arbitration clauses compared to ten percent of domestic contracts. Our results suggest, in contracts involving two sophisticated actors, that the parties perceive preserving access to litigation to be value-enhancing compared to ex ante binding arbitration. This contrasts with widespread beliefs about arbitration’s efficiency and with imposition of mandatory arbitration clauses in some standardized consumer transactions such as credit card and cellular phone contracts.
机译:我们研究了报告公司在2002年6个月期间针对12种类型的合同以及在2002年7个月针对合并合同而在8-K表格中作为证物包含的2858个合同数据。因为仅在重大事件中才需要8-K备案,所以这些合同很可能由经验丰富的当事人精心协商,他们充分了解合同条款。因此,这些合同提供了有效的事前解决合同问题的证据。绝大多数合同不需要仲裁。只有约11%的合同包含有约束力的仲裁条款。仲裁条款的利率因合同类型而有很大不同。例如,合并和服务协议以及信托协议没有仲裁条款,而就业和许可合同的仲裁条款比率最高,分别为37%和33%。仲裁条款与合同条款的标准化存在很大的负相关:合同越标准化,就越不可能强制进行争议仲裁。与加利福尼亚州有联系的合同倾向于具有较高的仲裁条款,而与纽约有联系的合同倾向于具有较低的仲裁条款。具有国际关系的合同中更可能出现仲裁条款,但即使在此类合同中,从绝对意义上讲,该条款也很少出现。国际合同中只有20%包含仲裁条款,而国内合同中只有10%。我们的结果表明,在涉及两名资深参与者的合同中,与事前具有约束力的仲裁相比,当事方认为保留诉讼的机会是增值的。与此形成鲜明对比的是,人们普遍认为仲裁效率高,并且在一些标准化的消费者交易中(例如信用卡和手机合同)强加了强制性仲裁条款。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号